The wildlife trade in China is rooted in long-held beliefs about the benefits of eating exotic and often endangered animals for good health. But the reality is in stark contrast. Chinese markets that sell and sell live wild animals, including endangered species like pangolins, often act as petri dishes for the germination and spread of deadly diseases such as severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) and bird flu deadly, each of which claimed hundreds of lives.
China's wildlife markets have reignited another global public health crisis with the deadly coronavirus, a lung disease that has claimed nearly 80 lives and distracted at least 2,700 people, providing more evidence than ever. or because the country has to close its wildlife markets forever.
The threat has spread to many other countries outside of China, including the United States, where five cases have been confirmed.
Reports from China describe the panicked nation and its people are angry at the government's failure to take decisive action to address the public health effects of the crisis. But it has also drawn criticism of the state's efforts to stop the wildlife trade, despite the many deadly precedents of past panic attacks.
"Chinese society is moving away from anger over the failure of wildlife policy," said Peter Li, development policy expert at Humane Societi International for China. "Social media is full of publications condemning the refusal to close the wildlife market. This is the worst Chinese New Year in recent Chinese history."
Almost two weeks after the world learned of this new coronavirus, China has taken a decisive step by announcing a temporary ban on all wildlife markets, as well as the transportation of wild animals and the sale wildlife online for the benefit of China. the health and safety of its citizens and the interests of public health around the world. According to the Washington Post, in a comment published on Friday, Chinese central television condemned the consumption of wild animals and called the new coronavirus "wild virus". It was also necessary for those who like to eat, attract and exchange wildlife.
But temporary convictions and injunctions are not enough; China must act firmly to end all markets for wildlife, in the interest of the health and safety of its citizens and in the interest of protecting the health of its people around the world. Part of this involves educating people about the dangers of consuming wild animals.
The virus is believed to originate from Juan Juan's seafood wholesale market in Wuhan, where vendors sold animals, including live dogs and cats, turtles, snakes, rats, hedgehogs, and seabirds. menu and internet billboards also mentioned foxes, wolf cubs, monkeys and a masked civet. These wildlife markets are dirty and crowded places where animals are displayed in small cages. Once purchased, they are often killed on the spot, which not only creates a danger to human health, but also a nightmare for animals.
Get your pet more safe with Modern Designed Cat Bed Australia
Many animals marketed and killed in the markets are in danger. In fact, wildlife experts say that the wildlife trade is one of the biggest threats to the survival of many species. And although China is currently a novelty, this trade is not limited to a single country: it occurs everywhere in the world, and also here in the United States, where diseases such as salmonellosis, food poisoning induced by bacteria have spread to humans from their favorite reptiles. .
It was the last time that China attempted to close its wildlife markets after the SARS epidemic about 17 years ago in 2003, although these efforts stopped after about six months. HSI supports the Chinese government, which makes banning wildlife trade an ongoing policy. In recent years, China has shown a firm determination to end the unnecessary exploitation of wildlife, mainly by restricting the ivory trade. It is hoped that this recent epidemic and the chaos it has caused will prompt the government to take equally decisive action to end the country's wildlife markets. For the Chinese people and around the world, an ounce of prevention in this case will certainly cost much more than a kilo of treatment.
No comments:
Post a Comment